Safety and Efficacy of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Angioplasty for Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Access: A randomized trial Comparing with Angioplasty Alone.

PURPOSE: To assess whether angioplasty of hemodialysis access (HA) stenosis with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) would prevent restenosis in comparison with plain-balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomized clinical trial enrolled 120 patients with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulae (n = 109) and grafts (n = 11), due to a ≥50% stenosis between March 2014 and April 2018. All patients underwent high-pressure balloon angioplasty and were then randomized to either DCB (n = 60) or PTA (n = 60). Patients were followed-up for 1 year, and angiography was performed 6 months after angioplasty. The primary endpoint was the late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included other angiographic parameters at 6 months and HA failures, adverse event, and mortality at 12 months. Continuous variables were compared with a Student t-test, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for freedom from HA failure and for mortality. RESULTS: LLL in the DCB and in the PTA group were 0.64 mm ± 1.20 and 1.13 mm ± 1.51, respectively (P = .082, adjusted P = .0498). DCB was associated with lower percentage stenosis (54.2% ± 19.3 vs 61.7% ± 18.2; P = .047) and binary restenosis ≥50% (56.5% vs 81.1%; P = .009) than PTA. The number of HA failures after 12 months was lower for DCB than for PTA (45% vs 66.7%; P = .017). Mortality at 12 months was 10% and 8.3% in the DCB and PTA groups, respectively (P = .75). CONCLUSIONS: Despite LLL improvement that failed to reach statistical significance, this study demonstrated decreased incidence and severity of restenosis with DCB compared with PTA to treat dysfunctional HA.

Eye Lens Dosimetry in Interventional Radiology: Assessment With Dedicated Hp(3) Dosimeters.

PURPOSE: To quantify eye lens dose in interventional radiology and assess whether neck dosimeter is a good surrogate to evaluate eye lens dosimetry. METHODS: Radiation exposure was prospectively measured in 9 interventional radiologists between May and October 2017. Standard Hp(0,07) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were worn at the neck outside the lead apron, and 2 dedicated eye lens Hp(3) TLDs were placed just above the eyes, one midline and another at the outer edge of the left eye. Correlations between eye lens and neck TLD doses were assessed with Pearson coefficient, and linear regression was used to predict eye lens dose from neck TLD values. RESULTS: Eye lens dose without eye protection was 0.18 ± 0.11 (mean ± standard deviation; 0.08-0.41) mSv per workday and 35.3 ± 6.6 mSv (16.3-82.9) annually (200 workdays/year). Five (56%) radiologists exceeded the 20 mSv annual eye lens dose limit. Eye lens doses from left and central TLDs were 12.46 ± 3.02 and 9.29 ± 3.38 mSv, respectively (P = .027). Mean eye lens (left and central) and neck TLD doses were 10.87 ± 2.67 and 16.56 ± 5.67 mSv, respectively (P = .008). Pearson correlation coefficient between both eye lens TLD and between mean eye lens TLD and neck TLD doses were 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. Average of eye lens dose was 0.0179 + (0.5971 × neck dose). CONCLUSION: Full-time interventional radiologists are likely to suffer from deterministic radiation effects to the eye lens, especially on the left side. Neck TLD significantly overestimates eye lens dose. However, eye lens doses are highly correlated with neck doses and may be predicted from the neck TLD values.

Percutaneous Thrombectomy with the JETi8 Peripheral Thrombectomy System for the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the JETi8 peripheral thrombectomy system in treating acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 18 consecutive patients (mean age, 41 years old [range, 15-74 years old]; 5 men and 13 women). There were 21 instances of DVTs (9 iliofemoral, 10 axillosubclavian, and 2 portal), which were treated using the JETi8 thrombectomy device between November 2016 and July 2018. Thrombus was laced with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-TPA) (9.3 mg, on average; range, 2-12 mg) in 17 procedures (81%) prior to thrombectomy. Technical success was defined as restoration of antegrade flow using the JETi8 with or without additional treatment of an underlying obstructive lesion. Procedural success was defined as technical success with or without the addition of overnight catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) RESULTS: Mean procedure time was 83 minutes (range, 30-160 minutes), and mean thrombus reduction with the JETi8 alone was 92% (range, 60%-100%). Stent placement was required in 6 procedures (29%). Technical success using the JETi8 system alone was 76% (16 of 21 procedures), whereas 5 procedures (24%) required subsequent overnight CDT in the intensive care unit. Procedural success rate was 100% (20 of 20 procedures). Mean aspirated volume was 531 mL (range, 250-1,230 mL). The only adverse event was a subsegmental pulmonary embolism. Seven patients (33%) were discharged the same day. Recurrent thrombosis was observed in 5 patients (24%), of whom 3 were successfully treated with the JETi8 system. CONCLUSIONS: The JETi8 system may be a safe and effective option for thrombectomy of acute DVT.

Clinical Validation of a Semi-Automated Software for Maximal Diameter Measurements for Endovascular Repair Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare automated measurements of maximal diameter (Dmax) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) orthogonal to luminal or outer wall envelope centerline for endovascular repair (EVAR) follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive patients with AAA treated by EVAR who had at least 1 computed tomography (CT) scan before and 2 CT scans after EVAR with at least 5 months' interval were included. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the AAA was achieved with dedicated segmentation software. Performances of automated calculation algorithms of Dmax perpendicular to lumen or outer wall envelope centerlines were then compared to manual measurement of Dmax on double-oblique multiplanar reconstruction (gold standard). Accuracy of automated Dmax measurements at baseline, follow-up, and progression over time was evaluated by calculation of mean error, Bland-Altman plot, and regression models. RESULTS: Disagreement in Dmax measurements between outer wall envelope algorithm and manual method was insignificant (mean error: baseline, -0.07 ± 1.66 mm, P = .7; first follow-up, 0.24 ± 1.69 mm, P = .2; last follow-up, -0.41 ± 2.74 mm, P = .17); whereas significant discrepancies were found between the luminal algorithm and the manual method (mean error: baseline, -1.24 ± 2.01 mm, P < .01; first follow-up, -1.49 ± 3.30 mm, P < .01; last follow-up, -1.78 ± 3.60 mm, P < .01). Dmax progression results were more accurate with AAA outer wall envelope algorithm compared to luminal method (P = .2). CONCLUSIONS: AAA outer wall envelope segmentation is recommended to enable automated calculation of Dmax perpendicular to its centerline during EVAR follow-up.

Adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism: concordance of simultaneous vs sequential sampling.

OBJECTIVE: Many investigators believe that basal adrenal venous sampling (AVS) should be done simultaneously, whereas others opt for sequential AVS for simplicity and reduced cost. This study aimed to evaluate the concordance of sequential and simultaneous AVS methods. DESIGN AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 2015, bilateral simultaneous sets of basal AVS were obtained twice within 5 min, in 188 consecutive patients (59 women and 129 men; mean age: 53.4 years). Selectivity was defined by adrenal-to-peripheral cortisol ratio ≥2, and lateralization was defined as an adrenal aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio ≥2, the contralateral side. Sequential AVS was simulated using right sampling at -5 min (t = -5) and left sampling at 0 min (t = 0). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean selectivity ratio (P = 0.12 and P = 0.42 for the right and left sides respectively) and in mean lateralization ratio (P = 0.93) between t = -5 and t = 0. Kappa for selectivity between 2 simultaneous AVS was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.82), whereas it was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.93) between sequential and simultaneous AVS at respectively -5 min and at 0 min. Kappa for lateralization between 2 simultaneous AVS was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.75-0.93), whereas it was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.94) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90) between sequential AVS and simultaneous AVS at respectively -5 min at 0 min. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between simultaneous and sequential AVS was not different than that between 2 repeated simultaneous AVS in the same patient. Therefore, a better diagnostic performance is not a good argument to select the AVS method.

Adrenal venous sampling in primary aldosteronism: multinomial regression modeling to detect aldosterone secretion lateralization when right adrenal sampling is missing.

OBJECTIVE: Difficulty to recognize or canulate the right adrenal vein is the most frequent cause of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) failure. We aimed to assess multinomial regression modeling (MRM) of peripheral and left adrenal vein samplings to detect lateralization of aldosterone secretion when the right AVS is missing. METHODS: Simultaneous bilateral AVS samplings were performed before (basal) and after intravenous cosyntropin injection in 188 consecutive patients between December 1989 and September 2015. Different reference standards for lateralization of aldosterone secretion were defined for basal and for postcosyntropin AVS and according to lateralization index cutoffs at least 2 and at least 4. MRMs were built to detect lateralization of aldosterone secretion according to these reference standards using only peripheral and left adrenal veins samplings (without the right AVS). Detection accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves and detection sensitivities were reported for specificity at least 95%. RESULTS: For basal AVS with lateralization index at least 2, AUROC were respectively 0.931 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.894-0.968] and 0.922 (95% CI 0.882-0.962) for right and left lateralization of aldosterone secretion detection and MRM could detect respectively 65.5 and 62.7% of the right and left lateralization of aldosterone secretion. For AVS after cosyntropin with lateralization index at least 4, AUROC were respectively 0.964 (95% CI: 0.940-0.987) and 0.955 (95% CI: 0.927-0.983) for right and left lateralization of aldosterone secretion, and MRM could detect respectively 77.2 and 72.9% of the right and left lateralization of aldosterone secretion. CONCLUSION: MRM can detect lateralization of aldosterone secretion without the right AVS in most patients and could eliminate the need for repeat AVS when right adrenal vein canulation is nonselective or impossible.

Results of a randomized clinical trial of external beam radiation to prevent restenosis after superficial femoral artery stenting.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of external beam radiation (EBR) in preventing restenosis after superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting in comparison with a control group treated with SFA stenting only. METHODS: In this Institutional Review Board-approved study, patients who provided written informed consent were randomly assigned to 0 Gy or 14 Gy of EBR to the stent site 24 hours after SFA stenting. The primary end point was the angiographic binary restenosis rate 2 years after stenting. Categorical and continuous end points were respectively analyzed using logistic regression models and Wilcoxon tests. End points expressed as time to event were analyzed using a log-rank test. RESULTS: The study included 155 patients, 46 women and 109 men (mean age, 66 years; range, 45-85 years). In the 0 and 14 Gy groups, binary restenosis was present, respectively, in 44% (34/77) and 68% (52/76; P = .003) 2 years after stenting. Stent thrombosis occurred in 13% (10/78) of the 0 Gy group and in 33% (25/77) of the 14 Gy group (P = .003). Target lesion revascularization at 2 years was 26% (25/78) in the 0 Gy group and 30% (23/77) in the 14 Gy group (P = .56). There were no significant differences in total walking distances change from baseline to 2 years (46 ± 100 and 26 ± 79 m, respectively, in the 0 Gy and 14 Gy group; P = .25). There were no procedure-related deaths and no major amputations. CONCLUSIONS: A single 14 Gy dose of EBR to the SFA stenting site did not prevent in-stent restenosis.

Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM) reperfusion after percutaneous embolization: Sensitivity and specificity of non-enhanced CT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of non-enhanced chest CT to detect reperfusion after pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM) embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study and waived the need for patient consent. All consecutive patients who underwent PAVM embolization between January 2000 and April 2011 were included. Complex PAVMs and patients without available pre- and/or post-embolization CT were excluded. PAVM artery, aneurysm and vein diameters were measured on non-enhanced chest CT before and after PAVM embolization. Pulmonary angiography (PA) was the reference standard to assess PAVM reperfusion. Reperfusion detection was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves according to percentage of diameter reduction cut-off. Inter-observer concordance was ascertained with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Out of 68 patients with PAVM embolizations, 42 (62%) had 108 PAVMs that met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Areas under the ROC curves for PAVM reperfusion detection were 0.84, 0.87, and 0.78, respectively, for PAVM artery, aneurysm and vein (p>0.05). Sensitivity varied between 51% and 56%, and specificity between 86% and 98% for the <30% diameter reduction cut-off. Sensitivity was between 98% and 100%, and specificity, between 20% and 47% for the <70% diameter reduction cut-off. ICCs for inter-observer concordance were 0.58, 0.88 and 0.68 for percentage reduction of PAVM artery, aneurysm and vein, respectively. CONCLUSION: PAVM diameter reduction cut-offs of <30% and <70%, to detect PAVM reperfusion on non-enhanced CT reported in the literature, would respectively result in low sensitivity and specificity.

Adrenal Vein Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism: Sensitivity and Specificity of Basal Adrenal Vein to Peripheral Vein Cortisol and Aldosterone Ratios to Confirm Catheterization of the Adrenal Vein.

PURPOSE: To assess the sensitivity and specificity for ratios of adrenal vein cortisol level (Ca) to peripheral vein cortisol level (Cp), adrenal vein aldosterone level (Aa) to peripheral vein aldosterone level (Ap), and combined cortisol and aldosterone levels ("combined ratio") for the detection of successful adrenal vein catheterization ("selectivity") in adrenal vein sampling (AVS) without adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) injection at different cutoff values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. AVS was performed in 160 consecutive patients (49 women and 111 men; mean age, 53.6 years) between December 1989 and January 2014. Cortisol and aldosterone levels were measured in samples from the adrenal veins and left iliac vein every 5 minutes, two times before (basal) and three times after intravenous cosyntropin (ACTH 1-24) injection. Selectivity was defined by Ca/Cp or Aa/Ap ratio of at least 5 in at least one sampling after ACTH administration. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of selective adrenal vein catheterization were calculated for basal Ca/Cp ratio, Aa/Ap ratio, and combined ratios for three cutoff values reported in the literature. The McNemar test was used to assess differences in sensitivity and specificity to detect selective adrenal vein catheterization. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity for the cutoff values of at least 3, at least 2, and at least 1.1 for the detection of AVS selectivity were respectively 50.4% and 100%, 70.8% and 100%, and 98.5% and 76.9% for Ca/Cp ratio; 61.3% and 100%, 70.8% and 100%, and 94.2% and 53.8% for Aa/Ap ratio; and 75.2% and 100%, 88.3% and 100%, and 99.3% and 46.2% for combined ratios (sensitivity at the ≥2 cutoff value: P < .0001 for combined ratio vs Ca/Cp ratio and for combined ratio vs Aa/Ap ratio). CONCLUSION: Basal combined ratio has the best sensitivity for the detection of AVS selectivity at all cutoff values, and for all ratios, the cutoff value of at least 2 has the best sensitivity for 100% specificity.

Value of C-Arm Computed Tomography to Evaluate Stent Deployment During Femoro-Popliteal Revascularization.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of C-arm computed tomography (CT) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in detecting incomplete stent expansion (ISE) after superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as a gold standard. MATERIALS: Fifty patients with symptomatic SFA occlusive disease requiring angioplasty were prospectively included. Once technical success (<30 % residual stenosis) was obtained on post-procedural DSA, C-arm CT and IVUS were acquired. DSA and C-arm CT examinations were reviewed by 2 investigators and correlated with IVUS. C-arm CT image quality was rated on a four-point scale. Doppler ultrasound was performed at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The ankle-brachial index was 0.69 ± 0.10 and 0.99 ± 0.40, respectively, pre- and post-procedure. C-arm CT imaging quality was rated as good or excellent in 80%. In-stent minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was evaluated at 4.71 ± 0.7 mm on DSA, 3.39 ± 0.6 mm on IVUS, and 3.12 ± 0.9 mm on C-arm CT. Compared to IVUS, DSA demonstrated an overestimation of MLD (p = 0.0001), an underestimation of ISE (DSA = 18.8% ± 7.6; IVUS = 29.8% ± 9) (p < 0.0001), and a poor inter-technique intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.24). No difference was observed between IVUS and C-arm CT in ISE as calculated by diameter (29.8 ± 9 vs. 28.2 ± 12.5%, p = 0.5) and area (30.2 ± 8.4 vs. 33.3 ± 9.5%, p = 0.2). Inter-technique ICC between C-arm CT and IVUS was 0.72 [95%CI 0.49; 0.85] for MLA measurements. The inter-observer ICC for MLD and MLA measurements on C-arm CT were, respectively, estimated at 0.75 [95% CI 0.40, 0.89] and 0.77 [95% CI 0.43, 0.90)]. CONCLUSIONS: C-arm CT presents a better correlation with IVUS than DSA to determine lumen diameter and ISE immediately after percutaneous revascularization.

Coaxial guide wire placement in the right adrenal vein for repeated adrenal venous samplings.

PURPOSE: Many adrenal venous sampling (AVS) protocols require repeated samplings before and after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation. Maintaining catheter selectivity in the adrenal vein over time is essential but can be challenging, especially in the short right adrenal vein, where the catheter is often in an unstable position. The aim of our study was to evaluate guide wire insertion into the right adrenal vein catheter to sustain AVS selectivity (adrenal/peripheral cortisol ratio [Ca/Cp]) over time. METHODS: This retrospective investigation was approved by our institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained. A 0.014-inch guide wire was inserted in the right adrenal vein 5F catheter to secure its positioning and to facilitate blood sampling. Plasma cortisol levels from the left and right adrenal veins and left iliac vein were assessed in 117 consecutive patients undergoing bilateral, simultaneous sets of AVS at -5 and 0 min (baseline) and 5, 10, and 15 min after intravenous bolus of 250 µg ACTH (stimulated). Ca/Cp ratios of ≥2 for baseline and >10 for stimulated AVS were considered selective. RESULTS: The first sampling, at time -5 min, was nonselective in 41 of 116 (35.3 %) right and 30 of 116 (25.9 %) left AVSs retained for analysis. In patients with a selective first sampling, 74 of 75 (98.7 %) right and 85 of 86 (98.8 %) left AVSs were selective in all post-ACTH samplings. Right and left selectivity rates were not statistically different (p > 0.87). No complications arose from guide wire insertion. CONCLUSION: Guide wire insertion into the right adrenal vein catheter is safe and effective to maintain AVS selectivity over time.

Measurements and detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: Accuracy and reproducibility of a segmentation software.

PURPOSE: To validate the reproducibility and accuracy of a software dedicated to measure abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter, volume and growth over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A software enabling AAA segmentation, diameter and volume measurement on computed tomography angiography (CTA) was tested. Validation was conducted in 28 patients with an AAA having 2 consecutive CTA examinations. The segmentation was performed twice by a senior radiologist and once by 3 medical students on all 56 CTAs. Intra and inter-observer reproducibility of D-max and volumes values were calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Systematic errors were evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis. Differences in D-max and volume growth were compared with paired Student's t-tests. RESULTS: Mean D-max and volume were 49.6±6.2mm and 117.2±36.2ml for baseline and 53.6±7.9mm and 139.6±56.3ml for follow-up studies. Volume growth (17.3%) was higher than D-max progression (8.0%) between baseline and follow-up examinations (p<.0001). For the senior radiologist, intra-observer ICC of D-max and volume measurements were respectively estimated at 0.997 (≥0.991) and 1.000 (≥0.999). Overall inter-observer ICC of D-max and volume measurements were respectively estimated at 0.995 (0.990-0.997) and 0.999 (>0.999). Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent inter-reader agreement with a repeatability coefficient <3mm for D-max, <7% for relative D-max growth, <6ml for volume and <6% for relative volume growth. CONCLUSION: Software AAA volume measurements were more sensitive than AAA D-max to detect AAA growth while providing an equivalent and high reproducibility.

Reproducibility of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurement and growth evaluation on axial and multiplanar computed tomography reformations.

PURPOSE: To compare different methods measuring abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maximal diameter (Dmax) and its progression on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty AAA patients with two MDCT scans acquired at different times (baseline and follow-up) were included. Three observers measured AAA diameters by seven different methods: on axial images (anteroposterior, transverse, maximal, and short-axis views) and on multiplanar reformation (MPR) images (coronal, sagittal, and orthogonal views). Diameter measurement and progression were compared over time for the seven methods. Reproducibility of measurement methods was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Dmax, as measured on axial slices at baseline and follow-up (FU) MDCTs, was greater than that measured using the orthogonal method (p = 0.046 for baseline and 0.028 for FU), whereas Dmax measured with the orthogonal method was greater those using all other measurement methods (p-value range: <0.0001-0.03) but anteroposterior diameter (p = 0.18 baseline and 0.10 FU). The greatest interobserver ICCs were obtained for the orthogonal and transverse methods (0.972) at baseline and for the orthogonal and sagittal MPR images at FU (0.973 and 0.977). Interobserver ICC of the orthogonal method to document AAA progression was greater (ICC = 0.833) than measurements taken on axial images (ICC = 0.662-0.780) and single-plane MPR images (0.772-0.817). CONCLUSION: AAA Dmax measured on MDCT axial slices overestimates aneurysm size. Diameter as measured by the orthogonal method is more reproducible, especially to document AAA progression.

Percutaneous embolization of iatrogenic arterial kidney injuries: safety, efficacy, and impact on blood pressure and renal function.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous renal artery embolization (RAE) of iatrogenic vascular kidney injuries and the effects of RAE on renal function and arterial blood pressure (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 12-year period, 50 consecutive patients with severe hemorrhage after iatrogenic arterial kidney injuries underwent RAE. Technical success was defined as occlusion of the bleeding site, and clinical success was defined as complete bleeding cessation. The effects on renal function and arterial BP were assessed by comparing the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), renal function stage (National Kidney Foundation scale), systolic BP, and BP stage (European Society of Hypertension classification) before and after RAE. RESULTS: RAE was technically successful in 49 patients (98%). Two patients were lost to follow-up after RAE. Clinical success was obtained in 40 (83%), 45 (94%), and 47 patients (98%), respectively, at 24, 48, and 96 hours after RAE. Three patients (6%) had minor complications, and one patient (2%) died within 30 days after RAE. Follow-up renal function data (mean, 4 mo) were available for 33 patients (66%). No statistically significant differences in eGFR (P = .186) or renal function stage (P = .183) were apparent after RAE. Follow-up BP data (mean, 3 mo) were available for 28 patients (56%). There were no significant differences in systolic BP (P = .233) or BP stage (P = .745) after RAE. CONCLUSIONS: Embolization of iatrogenic renal artery injuries is safe and associated with high technical and clinical success rates. It is not associated with a significant worsening of renal function or increase in BP.

Management of peripheral arterial disease: role of computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography.

The recent technological developments of CT and MR units enable fast angiographic acquisitions with an improved spatial and temporal resolution. With advanced 3D visualisation, image post-processing and vessel wall-imaging, these technologies are now almost replacing diagnostic angiography that is now mainly indicated in case of suboptimal computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) examinations. Catheter angiography is now used to guide endovascular therapy and the planning of endovascular intervention will rely mainly on CTA or MRA examinations. The relative indications of MRA and CTA for the assessment and follow-up of peripheral arterial disease are based on the clinical indication, potential contraindication and the accessibility. We will review in this chapter, the technical requirements to perform adequate CTA and MRA examination, the relative indications of both modalities for the diagnosis and management of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) and abdominal and peripheral aneurysm diseases. The main imaging features observed in these patients will be detailed.

Renal artery revascularization: predictive value of kidney length and volume weighted by resistive index.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of renal length, volume, and resistive index measurements at Doppler ultrasound and MR angiography in predicting improvement after renal angioplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients underwent Doppler ultrasound examinations and MR angiography before percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. Renal length, total and cortical volumes, and resistive index were calculated. Combinations of length, volume, and resistive index measurements were correlated with improvement in blood pressure and renal function after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. Thresholds for improving patient selection were chosen after analysis of receiver operating characteristics curves. RESULTS: Lower total and cortical volumes on MR angiograms and shorter kidney length on Doppler ultrasound images were found among patients with successful blood pressure control (p = 0.042, p = 0.035, and p = 0.016, respectively). Renal length measured with Doppler ultrasound and cortical volume measured with MR angiography weighted by resistive index were the best predictive factors (p = 0.004, p = 0.006). Using a threshold of renal length-resistive index product less than 7 cm, therapeutic response was predicted with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 50%, whereas with a threshold value of 52 mL/m(2) for cortical renal volume-resistive index product divided by body surface area, sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 50% were obtained. CONCLUSION: Renal length and volume combined with resistive index measurements appear to be predictive of therapeutic response after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty.

Embolization of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations with amplatzer vascular plugs: safety and midterm effectiveness.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Amplatzer vascular plugs (AVPs) for percutaneous closure of arteries feeding pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 45-month period, 24 consecutive patients with at least one PAVM treated with an AVP were selected from a database on patients with a PAVM who received embolotherapy. Immediate technical success was defined as the complete absence of flow through the PAVM after embolization without the need for additional embolization material. Success on follow-up imaging was defined as a reduction in size of at least 70% of the aneurysm or draining vein on follow-up computed tomography or the absence of flow through the PAVM on a subsequent pulmonary angiogram. RESULTS: Thirty-seven AVPs were used to close 36 feeding arteries in 35 PAVMs in seven male and 17 female patients aged 11-86 years (mean age, 50 y). Technical success was achieved in 35 feeding arteries (97%). One feeding artery required two AVPs for closure. There were no immediate procedure-related complications. At a mean clinical follow-up of 322 days (range, 1-1,126 d), all patients were alive without new PAVM-related complications. Imaging follow-up was available for 29 embolized vessels (81%) with a mean follow-up of 418 days (range, 40-937 d), and recanalization occurred in two treated vessels (7%). CONCLUSIONS: AVPs are safe and effective for closure of PAVMs feeding vessels that can be reached with a guiding catheter, with an acceptable rate of recanalization.

Endobronchial dilation for the management of bronchial stenosis in patients after lung transplantation: effect of stent placement on survival.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of patients treated with balloon dilation and stent placement in the management of bronchial strictures after lung transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one lung recipients were treated with balloon dilation or stent placement between January 1997 and July 2005. Stent placement was reserved for cases of bronchoplasty technical failure or restenosis. Clinical files and results of pulmonary function tests and bronchoscopic evaluation were reviewed. Dyspnea and cough were defined according to the Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale. Patient survival and bronchial patency after bronchial intervention were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression with analysis of stent implantation as a cofactor. RESULTS: Twenty-three of the 41 patients (56%) received a stent because of balloon dilation failure or stenosis recurrence. A total of 243 procedures were performed in 106 strictures (205 bronchoplasties and 38 stent insertions). At the first session, primary patency was higher in patients treated with stents (71%) than in those who underwent bronchoplasty (19%) (P = .037). Mean survival in patients with stents was longer than that in those who underwent bronchoplasty (82 vs 22 months, respectively), and stent insertion was associated with a 66% reduction in the risk of death (P < .02). Primary patency was 40 months for stented strictures versus 10 months for strictures treated with bronchoplasty (P < .02). Dyspnea and cough were improved after intervention (P < .001), and the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was ameliorated by 17% (P < .00003) at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcome and FEV(1) were improved after bronchoplasty and stent placement. Longer patient survival and bronchial patency were observed after stent insertion.

Role of the endothelial lining in endoleak formation and persistence after endovascular repair of aneurysm.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether ablation of the endothelial lining of an aneurysm can prevent endoleak persistence after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bilateral aneurysms were constructed in common iliac arteries in three different experimental groups. In group 1 (six dogs), 12 aneurysms without collateral outflow were created, the endothelial layer was removed on one side, and stent-grafts were implanted immediately after surgery with endovascular creation of a type I endoleak. In group 2 (six dogs), the same experiment was performed in aneurysms with collateral outflow. In group 3 (three dogs), six aneurysms with collateral outflow were denuded, but stent-grafts were implanted 3 months later. Follow-up imaging was performed with Doppler ultrasonography (US) and angiography until animal sacrifice 3 months after EVAR. Leak persistence and healing were also evaluated with macroscopic and histopathologic examination. RESULTS: Type I endoleaks persisted in all endothelialized group 1 aneurysms (six of six), but in none that were denuded before stent-graft implantation (P = .03). The ratio between the maximum diameter of the aneurysm measured before sacrifice and at baseline was significantly lower in denuded aneurysms than in aneurysms with an intact endothelial layer (74% vs 92%, P = .003). Endoleaks were observed in all aneurysms of groups 2 (denuded and intact endothelium) and 3. All endoleak areas were surrounded by endothelial lining. CONCLUSIONS: In this animal model of EVAR, ablation of the endothelial lining promotes long-term endoleak thrombosis after EVAR. The presence of collateral flow can promote re-endothelialization and endoleak persistence.

Recovery G2 inferior vena cava filter: technical success and safety of retrieval.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and technical success of the retrieval of the Recovery G2 filter when implanted for temporary protection against pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Recovery G2 inferior vena cava (IVC) filter was placed in 120 consecutive patients between September 2005 and September 2006 in a single center. Patients had deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (n = 63), pulmonary embolism and DVT (n = 55), and high risk for pulmonary embolism without recent thromboembolic disease (n = 2). Indications for filter placement included contraindication to anticoagulation (n = 106), failure of anticoagulation (n = 11), and prophylaxis in addition to anticoagulation (n = 3). In patients eligible for filter removal, the authors measured the mean implantation time, filter retrieval success rate, and retrieval procedure time. In addition, they assessed filter tilting, migration, caval penetration, thrombus within the filter, fracture, and caval injury or stenosis. RESULTS: In the 51 patients who met the criteria for filter removal, filter tilting (>15 degrees ) was seen in six patients (12%), small thrombi were seen in filters of 15 patients (29%), presumed caval penetration was seen in nine patients (18%), and caudal filter migration was seen in two patients (3.9%). There were no fractures or cephalic migrations. Removal attempts were successful in all 51 patients (100%). The mean implantation time was 53.4 days (range, 7-242 days), and the retrieval procedure time averaged 16.8 minutes (range, 5-60 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Retrieval of the Recovery G2 filter is safe and can be performed successfully in patients who no longer need IVC filtration.